Get Involved
Make a Difference: How You Can Help Drive Change in This Legal Struggle
Three years into this unprecedented legal crisis, I find myself at the same pivotal crossroads I faced on April 26, 2022—still awaiting a proper divorce and a just resolution to what has become a defining family law case. I urgently need your help, as the absence of meaningful recourse not only jeopardizes my family’s future, but it also sets a dangerous precedent for MSAs that could have far-reaching consequences that could affect countless others.
In 2020, Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley issued a stark warning, “Divorced Wisconsinites beware: from this day forward, a court may at any time rewrite the terms of your marital settlement agreement if your former spouse comes to court pleading ‘unfair.’” This is not merely a cautionary tale—it is a grim reality that exposes an alarming trend: agreements once thought to be final and binding are now vulnerable to arbitrary revision at the court’s discretion, leaving lives in disarray.
My case, however, amplifies this concern to an unprecedented level. Not only did the court lose the terms of our divorce, leaving us erroneously divorced under an outdated MSA, but Judge Keberlein then fabricated a “reconstructed” MSA based on false testimony, imposed a divorce without my consent, and is now attempting to compel my compliance under threat of penalty.
If my case remains unresolved, it will fuel the very risks Justice Bradley warned about—an erosion of the foundation of marriage and divorce law. Contradictory rulings from both the circuit and appellate courts have already opened the door to a system where the state’s involvement in marriages and divorces could be questioned or, more alarmingly, rendered irrelevant. Even more concerning is the possibility that the state could act without the consent of the citizens it governs, undermining the fundamental principles of family law.
On this page, you will find specific actions where your support is urgently needed. At this moment, the most critical need is for pressure to be applied to those in positions of power—whether it be Judge Keberlein, Sheriff Matz, the Judicial Commission, your state representative, or the media.
Below, you’ll find customizable call-to-action letter templates designed to help you take immediate action. Feel free to copy, edit, and send these letters via email, regular mail, contact forms, or social media—whichever method works best for you. If you prefer, you can simply fill out the form below to consent to me sending these letters on your behalf, saving you time and effort, while allowing you to advocate effectively for my case.
Please check this page regularly, as your ongoing involvement is crucial to securing a just resolution.
As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. profoundly stated, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
Use these Call-to-Action Letter Templates to Take Action and Drive Meaningful Change
Message to Raise Awareness and Support Through Your Social Media Accounts
🚨 Incredible Legal Battle 🚨
Elizabeth Fitzgibbon is at the center of a groundbreaking legal battle now before the United States Supreme Court. Her divorce was unlawfully finalized in Wisconsin using a fabricated agreement, false testimony, and forged judicial approval—all without consent, trial, or due process.
What’s at stake is far bigger than one family: This case challenges the very foundation of constitutional protections in America’s family courts. If left unchecked, it threatens to set a dangerous precedent—where courts can lose legal documents, rewrite facts, and impose fraudulent orders with no accountability or federal oversight.
SCOTUS Case No. 24-7187 (Fitzgibbon v. Fitzgibbon) raises urgent constitutional questions about due process, equal protection, judicial integrity, and federal review. It’s a case that could reshape how justice is safeguarded in family law across the country.
🔗 Learn more at www.thecaseofthemissingmsa.org
📢 Take action by sharing her story, demanding accountability, and standing up for constitutional rights in every courtroom.
Justice must not depend on jurisdiction. It must depend on the Constitution.
Letter to The Honorable Justices Of The United States Supreme Court
Honorable Justices Of The United States Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street NE
Washington, DC 20543
Dear Justices,
I write to urge this Court to grant certiorari in Elizabeth Anne Fitzgibbon v. Adam Paul Fitzgibbon, Case No. 24-7187—a case that, while originating in family court, presents constitutional violations so severe and far-reaching that it demands federal review.
This is not just a family law case. It is a case of national constitutional importance, highlighting urgent questions that go to the core of judicial accountability, due process, equal protection, and the integrity of court proceedings across the country. Millions of Americans pass through family courts every year, and yet those courts operate with virtually no federal oversight—even when state courts violate their own civil and criminal laws.
In Fitzgibbon, the Wisconsin trial court:
- Lost the final, intended Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) that was supposed to govern the parties’ uncontested divorce;
- Granted a divorce based on a previously nullified agreement;
- Fabricated a new divorce agreement based on contradictory testimony, without consent, trial, or evidentiary hearing;
- Falsely attributed approval of this fabricated agreement to a long-retired judicial officer;
- Backdated the divorce judgment to a hearing where the fabricated document was never presented;
- And selectively enforced only the property transfer provision against the petitioner—while ignoring every custodial term designed to protect the child.
The constitutional questions raised are not speculative—they are documented, preserved, and fundamental:
- Whether courts may fabricate documents, misattribute judicial approval, and impose judgments without trial or consent, without violating due process and equal protection.
- Whether a state court’s refusal to follow its own civil and criminal statutes—including those prohibiting fraud and forgery—violates the U.S. Constitution’s Contract Clause.
- Whether judges can act as both adjudicator and institutional stakeholder—such as when Title IV-D federal funding creates systemic conflicts of interest—without violating structural due process.
Despite the egregious and well-documented violations, Elizabeth has been denied every form of redress by the state judiciary. The trial court ignored her objections, and the appellate court issued rulings contradicting the factual record and disregarding controlling law. If this case cannot break through the jurisdictional wall that shields domestic relations cases from constitutional review, then none can.
This Court has intervened before when domestic relations cases presented constitutional crises. Fitzgibbon presents an equally compelling moment. Here is a chance to reaffirm the principle that fraud vitiates even the most solemn of judgments, and that state court misconduct cannot be cloaked in immunity simply because it arises from a family matter.
I urge the Court to do what only it can: grant certiorari in Case No. 24-7187 and seize this moment to establish the constitutional balance in a system that has veered dangerously off course. By taking this case, the Court will not only deliver justice in an extraordinary matter, but also send a resounding message that our constitutional rights are not conditional, and our courts are not beyond accountability. Specifically, this Court has the opportunity to:
- Reinforce that no court may fabricate and enforce fraudulent orders with impunity;
- Affirm that constitutional rights do not end at the threshold of family court;
- Establish, at last, a federal framework for judicial oversight and accountability in domestic relations matters, where millions of Americans remain vulnerable to unchecked abuse.
The time to act is now. The stakes are not just personal—they are institutional and national. Families across this country are vulnerable to the same unchecked abuses. This Court has the rare opportunity to correct that course.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
Letter to Judge Keberlein to Vacate the Unlawful Divorce Judgment and Transfer the Case to Marinette County
Honorable Judge Bryan Keberlein
Winnebago County Circuit Court
415 Jackson Street
Oshkosh, WI 54901
Dear Judge Keberlein,
I am writing as a concerned member of the public, deeply troubled by the events surrounding Elizabeth Fitzgibbon’s divorce case (Winnebago County, Wisconsin case #21FA-564), particularly the unlawful ruling issued on January 6, 2023. The actions leading to this decision have caused profound and lasting harm—not only to Elizabeth and her young son, but also to public trust in the judicial system as a whole. The gravity of these errors and abuses cannot be overstated, and immediate action is necessary to correct this miscarriage of justice.
Elizabeth’s divorce proceedings have been irrevocably marred by severe legal errors, document mishandling, and flagrant violations of her constitutional rights. The court’s failure to safeguard the Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA)—from its unlawful loss to the subsequent creation of a falsified MSA based on perjury—has left Elizabeth in a state of legal limbo. Moreover, your decision to retroactively finalize the divorce using perjured testimony, without regard for the legitimacy of the MSA, has deprived Elizabeth of a fair resolution, perpetuating not only judicial error, but also undermining the integrity of the entire legal process.
The conflict of interest inherent in this case—where the court responsible for the MSA’s loss was also tasked with “correcting” the error—has further compounded the injustice. Despite overwhelming evidence of manipulation and harm, Elizabeth’s attempts to challenge the ruling have been thwarted, reflecting a disturbing lack of accountability in the system. This denial of a fair hearing deepens the harm done to an already vulnerable family.
I urge you to vacate the January 6, 2023, divorce judgment immediately. Allowing this judgment to stand would irreparably damage public trust in the judicial system and set a dangerous precedent that judicial misconduct and abuses of power are tolerated. By vacating this fraudulent ruling, you have the opportunity to restore fairness, uphold the rule of law, and demonstrate the judiciary’s commitment to justice for all individuals.
Additionally, I urge you to approve Elizabeth’s request to transfer her case to Marinette County. The ongoing conflict of interest in Winnebago County—stemming from the court’s role in both losing and attempting to “recreate” the MSA—has made it clear that a fair and impartial adjudication cannot occur here. A change of venue is essential to ensure Elizabeth can present her case before an unbiased court, free from the errors and conflicts that have tainted the proceedings in Winnebago County. This is crucial not only for Elizabeth’s right to a fair hearing, but also for restoring public confidence in the judicial process.
The integrity of the legal system depends on eliminating any appearance of bias or corruption. A change of venue to Marinette County will guarantee Elizabeth the opportunity for justice, free from the cloud of conflict that has surrounded this case. Your decision will be pivotal in upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this urgent request. The public trusts that you will act swiftly to correct this wrong and restore the integrity of the judicial system. For more information, please visit www.thecaseofthemissingmsa.org.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
Letter to Sheriff John Matz to Not Enforce Judge Keberlein’s Invalid Order
Sheriff John Matz
Winnebago County Sheriff’s Office
4311 Jackson St,
Oshkosh, WI 54901
Dear Sheriff Matz,
I am writing as a concerned citizen regarding an ongoing legal matter that requires your immediate attention and discretion. The case of Elizabeth Fitzgibbon in Winnebago County (Winnebago County, Wisconsin case #21FA-564) presents serious constitutional violations and a clear miscarriage of justice. I respectfully urge you to exercise your authority as sheriff and refrain from enforcing the judge’s unlawful order, particularly in regard to Elizabeth’s rightful refusal to comply.
The actions of Judge Bryan Keberlein in this case—specifically the unlawful creation of a new Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) based on perjured testimony and the retroactive finalization of the divorce based on the falsified document—have violated Elizabeth’s due process rights and undermined the foundational principles of fairness and justice upon which our legal system is built. Despite these grave concerns, Judge Keberlein has issued an order demanding Elizabeth’s compliance with this fraudulent judgment.
It is essential to acknowledge that not all court orders are lawful. This particular order is deeply flawed, unconstitutional, and reflects a misuse of judicial authority. By enforcing or supporting this ruling, you would not only perpetuate this miscarriage of justice, but also participate in a violation of Elizabeth’s constitutional rights. I urge you to take a firm stand for fairness and justice by refusing to carry out any actions that would further harm Elizabeth, her young son, or the integrity of the judicial system.
Elizabeth has already suffered tremendously due to the court’s systemic failures, including the loss of critical legal documents and the imposition of a ruling based on deceit and falsehoods. Judge Keberlein’s actions have undermined her custody rights, caused potential irreparable harm to her relationship with her child, and placed her in financial jeopardy. Her refusal to comply with this unjust order is not an act of defiance, but one of resistance against an unconstitutional ruling. Elizabeth is standing up for justice, fairness, and the protection of her constitutional rights.
As the sheriff of Winnebago County, your duty is to uphold the law and protect the rights of all citizens. Enforcing this invalid order would not only be unjust, but it would also set a dangerous precedent, signaling that citizens must comply with orders regardless of their legality or constitutionality. It is imperative that you ensure Elizabeth’s case is treated fairly and lawfully and that she is not penalized for defending her rights against an unlawful ruling.
I respectfully urge you, Sheriff Matz, to carefully review the details of this case and use your discretion to withhold enforcement of this unlawful order. By doing so, you will protect an innocent individual from further harm and send a powerful message about the importance of upholding the Constitution.
Thank you for your attention to this crucial matter. I trust you will make the right decision in ensuring that justice is served. For more information, please visit www.thecaseofthemissingmsa.org.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
Letter to the Wisconsin Judicial Commission to Investigate and Appropriately Address Judge Keberlein’s Misconduct
Wisconsin Judicial Commission
P.O. Box 7911
Madison, WI 53707
Dear Members of the Wisconsin Judicial Commission,
I am a concerned member of the public and am writing to formally file a complaint regarding actions taken by Judge Bryan Keberlein in a family law case in Winnebago County, Wisconsin (21FA-564). Based on what I have come to understand, Judge Keberlein’s conduct in this case appears to be a serious violation of judicial ethics, involving coercion, perjury, and conflicts of interest, which have caused significant harm to the parties involved, especially to a mother and her young child.
Case Overview:
The case centers around a divorce proceeding that was initially held in February 2022, where a Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) that was central to the case had been lost by the court. This error was not discovered until weeks later, when it became clear that the court had lost the MSA, leaving no official record of its terms. The parties were then asked to co-create a new MSA to rectify the situation. However, what followed was a disturbing series of events that reflect a breakdown of judicial ethics and integrity.
Key Concerns:
- Coercion and Perjury: After Judge Keberlein was assigned to the case, he reversed a previous court decision to co-create a new MSA and instead ordered that the lost MSA be “recreated,” despite the court’s acknowledgment that this document could not be reconstructed. Further, Judge Keberlein coerced both parties into perjury, pressuring them to testify under false pretenses in an attempt to “recreate” a document that was simply not available. This situation involved a blatant abuse of judicial power.
- Fraudulent Legal Ruling: Despite the fact that neither party could recreate the MSA, and the court had already acknowledged that the document was lost, Judge Keberlein issued a retroactive divorce ruling based on perjured testimony. In doing so, he fabricated a new MSA and falsely portrayed the Family Court Commissioner, who was originally involved in their case, as endorsing it, despite the commissioner’s prior admission that they had never seen the MSA that Judge Keberlein purports to have recreated. This ruling was legally unsound and is a clear violation of judicial conduct.
- Conflict of Interest: Judge Keberlein was directly employed by the court that made the initial error in this case, leading to an undeniable conflict of interest. His attempts to “correct” the court’s mistake in this case only compounded the issues, and there is reasonable concern that his actions were motivated by a desire to cover up the court’s errors rather than ensure a fair and just process.
- Denial of Justice: When Elizabeth Fitzgibbon, the petitioner in the case, attempted to challenge the ruling through motions for reconsideration and appeals, the ruling was upheld, despite the obvious legal contradictions, and the request for relief from the Wisconsin Supreme Court was also rejected. This further exemplifies a systemic failure to address the wrongful actions of Judge Keberlein.
Request for Action:
As a concerned member of the public, I am requesting that the Wisconsin Judicial Commission urgently investigate Judge Bryan Keberlein’s conduct in this case for the following reasons:
- His involvement in coercing perjury and manipulating and falsifying legal documents undermines public trust in the judicial system.
- His actions exhibit a clear conflict of interest and demonstrate a failure to uphold the law and ethical standards expected of a judge.
- His decision to uphold fraudulent and unlawful proceedings is an affront to justice and integrity in the legal process.
I believe the actions of Judge Keberlein are not only a violation of judicial ethics, but have caused lasting harm to the individuals involved, particularly a vulnerable mother and her young child. These actions cannot be allowed to go unchecked.
I ask the Judicial Commission to investigate Judge Keberlein’s behavior in this case, hold him accountable for any violations of ethical or legal standards, and take appropriate action to ensure that such misconduct does not occur again in the future.
Thank you for your attention to this serious matter. I look forward to hearing from you regarding the steps that will be taken to address this misconduct. For more information, please visit www.thecaseofthemissingmsa.org.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
Letter to State Representative to Support Judge Keberlein’s Impeachment and Removal from the Bench
Dear Representative [Name],
I am writing to you as a concerned citizen regarding the deeply troubling conduct of Judge Bryan Keberlein of Winnebago County, Wisconsin, in the case of Elizabeth Fitzgibbon’s divorce proceedings (Winnebago County, Wisconsin case #21FA-564). The actions of Judge Keberlein throughout this case have not only undermined the principles of justice, but have also demonstrated clear violations of due process, judicial ethics, and basic fairness. I respectfully urge you to support or initiate efforts to investigate and remove Judge Keberlein from the bench.
The case in question involves a series of egregious legal missteps, including the loss of a crucial Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA), the creation of a fraudulent MSA based on perjury, a shocking decision to retroactively finalize the divorce using perjured testimony, and now his efforts to enforce the falsified MSA. Throughout this process, Judge Keberlein has been complicit in covering up these errors, ignoring fundamental legal standards, and ultimately making a ruling that was both unjust and legally untenable. His actions have caused immense harm to Elizabeth, her young son, and the integrity of the judicial system itself.
Specifically, Judge Keberlein:
- Ordered the “recreation” of a lost MSA, despite the court’s own acknowledgment that it could not be reconstructed, thereby proceeding with a legally untenable document.
Coerced Elizabeth and her husband into testifying under false pretenses, resulting in her husband’s perjury and triggering Judge Keberlein’s overt bias against Elizabeth for her rightful refusal to participate in this unlawful process. - Retroactively finalized the divorce based on perjured testimony, leveraging the prior approval of the Family Court Commissioner—who had erroneously divorced them in February 2022 under the wrong MSA and admitted in April 2022 that he had never seen the lost document. This commissioner is now falsely presented as endorsing Judge Keberlein’s fabricated and invalid MSA, deepening the court’s misconduct and fraud.
- Ignored multiple calls for reconsideration and shut down all attempts to rectify the numerous procedural errors, further solidifying the injustice.
- Now seeks to enforce this unconstitutional and invalid MSA, placing Elizabeth at risk of punishment for her non-compliance, despite the inherent invalidity of the document and the violation of her constitutional rights.
These actions are not only deeply unethical, but represent an abuse of judicial power that has far-reaching consequences for the individuals involved and the public trust in the judiciary. Judge Keberlein’s conduct in this case exemplifies the type of behavior that demands accountability. The gravity of these violations calls for immediate action.
I urge you to support or initiate an official investigation into Judge Keberlein’s actions, with a view toward impeachment and removal from the bench. Such conduct cannot be allowed to go unchallenged, as it represents a threat to the rule of law and the fairness of our judicial system. The people of Wisconsin deserve judges who uphold the law, respect due process, and act with integrity.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope you will stand with the citizens of Wisconsin in ensuring that justice is served and that our courts remain fair and impartial. For more information, please visit www.thecaseofthemissingmsa.org.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]
Letter to Media to Cover My Unlawful Divorce and Landmark Family Law Case
Dear [Media Outlet/Journalist’s Name],
I am writing as a concerned citizen to bring to your attention a deeply troubling and unjust legal case involving Elizabeth Fitzgibbon—a case with far-reaching implications for justice, accountability, and due process within the U.S. judicial system (Winnebago County, Wisconsin case #21FA-564). This case is not just about one individual’s struggle—it exposes systemic failures that need immediate public attention.
What began as a routine divorce proceeding in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, has spiraled into a nightmare of judicial misconduct, corruption, and blatant violations of constitutional rights. Below are the key issues that have defined this case:
- Lost Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) and Unlawful Divorce: The court lost the MSA under which Elizabeth and her husband believed they were divorcing. The court admitted to the irreproducibility of this lost document but chose to move forward with recreating it. Judge Bryan Keberlein’s decision to fabricate an MSA without any legal basis led to an unconstitutional divorce ruling.
- Coercion and Judicial Bias: Judge Keberlein coerced both parties into providing false testimony in an attempt to recreate the MSA. This led to perjury by Elizabeth’s husband and triggered a clear bias against Elizabeth when she rightly refused to participate in this unjust process. This compounded the judicial misconduct and undermined the integrity of the case.
- Fraudulent MSA and Retroactive Divorce: Despite Judge Keberlein’s admission that he never saw the MSA he sought to recreate, he falsely claimed to have done so. The divorce was retroactively finalized based on perjured testimony, which not only violated legal standards, but also called into question the court’s transparency and credibility.
- Misrepresentation and Misuse of Judicial Authority: The Family Court Commissioner who had initially ruled on the case—under the wrong MSA—was falsely portrayed as endorsing the fabricated MSA through Judge Keberlein. This act of misrepresentation deepened the court’s misconduct, further skewing the case and its outcome.
- Judicial Overreach and Punishment for Non-Compliance: After Elizabeth refused to comply with the fraudulent and unconstitutional ruling, Judge Keberlein moved to enforce the invalid order. Elizabeth now faces penalties for standing firm in defense of her constitutional rights, further demonstrating how the legal system can be weaponized to harm innocent individuals.
- Failure to Address Errors and Seek Accountability: Despite overwhelming evidence of manipulation and procedural errors, Elizabeth’s repeated calls for relief were denied. Judge Keberlein refused to address any of these issues, perpetuating an environment where systemic failures continue unchecked, leaving Elizabeth and her young son in an untenable situation.
This case is not an isolated incident. It is a striking example of how the family law system can be manipulated to benefit one party while systematically disadvantaging another. The judicial misconduct and bias in this case are not just violations of one person’s rights—they reveal a larger issue within the legal system that has far-reaching consequences for countless families.
As a concerned citizen, I urge you to give this case the attention it deserves and bring it into the public spotlight. Elizabeth Fitzgibbon’s fight is not just her own; it is a fight for fairness, transparency, and accountability in a system that should be serving justice. By investigating this case and highlighting the misconduct involved, you will help ensure that similar abuses of power are prevented in the future.
We strongly encourage your outlet to cover this critical issue and amplify Elizabeth’s call for justice. Your coverage could make a significant impact in bringing attention to this case and calling for the reforms necessary to protect citizens from judicial overreach and abuse.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to seeing this important issue addressed in your coverage. For more information, please visit www.thecaseofthemissingmsa.org.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Email]
[Your Phone Number]